For example, on my machine, if I create the following script:! In the second case some larger amount of stdin bytes? If so, the patch will have to be replaced with another one implementing read1 in the FileIO class. Hard to say. It seems at least possible that there are Python users for whom stdin being unbuffered with -u matters, so if there's any reasonable way of avoiding changing this it should probably be considered. It's not about changing it, stdin has always been buffered in py3k.
My original commit actually attempted to change it, and it failed I hadn't noticed it at first due to mis-testing on my part. The new patch is about putting it back in buffered mode even with '-u'. Sorry: I should have been clearer. It's the change from 2. So 'python3. Anyway, the patch looks good to me. I'm not sure I didn't write the new io in the first place but I'd say it was simply overlooked. Otherwise 'python3. Standard output is buffered because it is assumed there will be far more data going through it.
By buffering, the whole block is read into the buffer at once then the individual bytes are delivered to you from the fast in-memory buffer area. The counterpart of buffered output is unbuffered output, which is applied when you want to ensure the output has been written immediately without delay, before continuing. For example, standard error under a C runtime library is usually unbuffered by default. There are mainly two reasons: 1. You want unbuffered output when you already have a large sequence of bytes ready to write to disk and want to avoid an extra copy into a second buffer in the middle.
Buffered output streams will accumulate write results into an intermediate buffer, sending it to the OS file system only when enough data has accumulated or flush is requested. This reduces the number of file system calls. Since file system calls can be expensive on most platforms compared to short memcpy , the buffered output is a net win when performing a large number of small writes. A unbuffered output is generally better when you already have large buffers to send — copying to an intermediate buffer will not reduce the number of OS calls further and introduces additional work.
Unbuffered output has nothing to do with ensuring your data reaches the disk; that functionality is provided by flush , and works on both buffered and unbuffered streams. It is only required to commit it to disk when you invoke flush. Note that close will call flush on your behalf.
Disable output buffering Ask Question. Asked 13 years, 3 months ago. Active 1 year, 9 months ago. Viewed k times. Is output buffering enabled by default in Python's interpreter for sys.
If the answer is positive, what are all the ways to disable it? Suggestions so far: Use the -u command line switch Wrap sys. Improve this question. Whymarrh Eli Bendersky Eli Bendersky k 83 83 gold badges silver badges bronze badges.
The full CPython initialization logic is here: github. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. From Magnus Lycka answer on a mailing list : You can skip buffering for a whole python process using "python -u" or! Improve this answer. Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge. Seb Seb Original sys. In the latter case you can make use of these flushing solutions.
In Cpython not in pypy!!! This will behave like buffering, though it's rather batching. You don't need it on Python 3 where for line in pipe: yields as soon as possible. Show 10 more comments. Sousa 2, 1 1 gold badge 16 16 silver badges 14 14 bronze badges. TextIOWrapper open sys.
Russell Davis 7, 4 4 gold badges 36 36 silver badges 41 41 bronze badges. Federico A. Ramponi Federico A. Ramponi In Python3 you can just override the name of the print function with a flushing one.
Its a dirty trick though! Editing response to show response is not valid in recent version of python — Mike. If flushing on newlines is sufficient, as of Python 3. Show 2 more comments. Yes, it is. You can disable it on the commandline with the "-u" switch. Brian Brian k 28 28 gold badges silver badges bronze badges. Sousa's answer, but I couldn't comment yet. Tim Tim 1 1 gold badge 6 6 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges.
Except that there is no flush kwarg in python2. I was sure I tested it but somehow I was seemingly confused : I modified my answer, hope it's fine now. If the old sys. Mark Seaborn Mark Seaborn 1, 13 13 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges. If the old stdout still lives on sys.
0コメント